Have you ever wondered what happens to all the communication
and marketing materials the INGOs and other development agencies produce? I
have been working in the communication field for the past 9 years and sadly the
materials produced do not have a long shelf life.
Often times when an organization is awarded a brand new
project there is a whole lot of excitement. As the focal communication person I
often collaborate with the program team to develop a communication plan for the
new project. The budget has been allocated. The target audiences have been
defined in the project document and we are all set to go. So we sit with the
team and develop a communication plan. All the team members come up with
excellent ideas – brochure, short videos, posters, animated videos, programs on
FM and TV. These are all great materials to communicate about the project and
its progress during and after the implementation. We make plans to spend
thousands of dollars and ensure each and every project have dedicated
communication materials. The communication team puts in a lot of time and
effort to develop the materials and deliver on time. Lo and behold we have a
list of outcomes. The KPIs have been set. The report looks fantastic. The
projects end, new ones start and the cycle continues. On the other end, the
archivists have tons of communication materials to archive – documentation
complete.
That’s it. There is no more room for all the glossy and
expensive communication materials. Can it be reused? Hell no. All projects have
communication budget and it has to be spent. It is truly sad when I see a whole
bunch of materials collecting dust in the store rooms. The videos that took us
almost 6 months to produce is now in the YouTube channel. It was uploaded in
the organizations’ website, Facebook, Instagram, shared via twitter, the cloud.
How many hits have these videos generated after the project ended? None.
So why do we keep producing all these communication
materials when we know time and again that these won’t be used after the
project phases out. Why do we never assess the impact of communication/behavior
change communication? Why do we never conduct an end line survey to assess the
impacts of communication materials? It’s a great question but the process is
expensive and time consuming and we never have budget allocated for these kind
of activities? The truth is the project cycles are limited and the pressure to
start new ones takes away the interest from the ending ones. I know this
doesn’t make sense but that is how it works.
So what do we do? It’s simple:
1.
Do not print any materials unless you are
absolutely sure it doesn’t exist in the development sector. It is simple just
Google to find out its existence.
2.
Collaborate with likeminded organizations to
hinder duplication. I understand there is a competition to produce new and
attractive materials but what’s the use of these materials when it isn’t
reaching the targeted audience or if it has a limited shelf life.
3.
Reprint Reprint Reprint! I understand the
pressure for donor visibility but that can be achieved by acknowledging the
donors by printing their disclaimer anywhere in the Reprints.
4.
When an organization bids for a project ensure
communication personnel/team are consulted to develop a full fledge
communication budget dedicatedly allocated to assess the impact of
communication materials.
5.
Projects must include and prioritize ‘assess
impact of communication activities’ headings
Not all projects need communication activities assessment.
However every INGO should assess the impact at least once every 3 years. This
process will help the communication teams and the program teams to understand
and reflect what went wrong and what went right. When you realize what is
working it will surely help other projects to communicate effectively in the
future which saves a lot of time and money.
Comments
Post a Comment